| Help |
When I was growing up in the 19080s I recall a new type of book taking my elementary by storm -  choose your own adventure books. Genius! What better way to make reading a little more exciting to attention deficient youngsters only interested in flicking mud with sticks (at least that's what I was doing in 3rd grade). While not necessarily the most enlightening of literature these books asked the reader to abandon the monotony of repetitive page turning. Take left hand, grab bottom right page corner, pull to bottom left page corner and repeat.

As custom content developers we are always looking for ways to blow up what's expected of online training. Possibly subconsciously borrowing from my experience in grade school I've asked, why must there only be a table of contents and next and back arrows. Of course sometimes linear learning is unavoidable and the possibility for creative navigation is more challenging, but why not try and create the most engaging experience possible?

In a recent employee policy course that we've been developing we've done just that. After a brief animated introduction the screen is then divided into a number sections, each representing individual policies, their size based on their importance.



Once a policy is selected users are presented with click-able silhouettes of several characters. Each has a story to tell about their experiences with the respective policy. These are interactive videos where the user will either help the character make the right decision or help them see the err of their way. At any point the navigation options are minimal though the control is total. There is a play/pause button, the option to choose a different character or choose a different policy by returning to the divided policy selection page. With only the inclusion of a closed captioning button there are no other means of navigation. The interaction is more than intuitive and engaging and almost nothing resembles any traditional means.

 
There are 0 comments

Often when customized eLearning programs are initiated, the corporate stakeholders focus on the business and learning objectives, the corporate branding and tone, and the diversity and attributes of the audience. Rarely, is there a concrete discussion of the approach and whether humor or plain fun can be incorporated for a more compelling, memorable experience. And, if there is a discussion, it usually falls by the wayside as the other criteria are deemed more important.  There is an assumption that eLearning should not be fun or humorous because it may compromise the other objectives. This simply does not have to be the case. Consider using some of these techniques for customer service skills training or other online soft skills training. Work closely with your elearning content developer to create learning that is fun, compelling and effective.

    • Use real-life narratives and scenarios. Add some humorous dialogue that can apply across cultures, regions and ethnicities or make it easily editable for the specific regional audiences.
    • Create a thematic approach to a single module or series of modules. Get your audience ensnared in the storyline, eager for more.
    • Create compelling custom illustrations or use clever photographic images that reflect the real-world experience but in a lighter, more memorable way. 
    • Don't underestimate your audience. Humor and fun can be included with an adult flair. Think of all those email jokes and YouTube clips that fill your inbox. Do you open them? Why do you find them so irresistable?
    • Make gentle fun of key managers, create caricatures in language or illustration. For example, for one of our clients we created a super hero figure based on the Director of the target audience. The Director loved contributing to the design of his character ( and, even went further with the humorous elements than would have been done without his input!) and the audience found it hysterical.
    • Add unique interactivities that engage the learner yet convey the learning points.

      To see some outstanding examples of innovative custom eLearning solutions, contact Margie Herron at mherron@kmionline.com for a demonstration. In the appropriate context with the appropriate content, eLearning can and should be fun and effective.

       

     

     

     
    There are 0 comments

    So you have a custom eLearning project ready for kick-off. After careful evaluation of eLearning development companies, you have identified the best eLearning content developer and you are eager to start the development process. The problem is you don't know exactly where to find the content for this particular custom eLearning solution. Is it in the classroom materials you previously used for this course? Or does it reside within the mind of one of your colleagues? Will you provide a high level and/or a detailed course outline and script?
    Frequently,  clients have just such a challenge: where and in what form will the raw content be provided to the eLearning company? Identifying those sources is essential to accurately scope any custom eLearning solution. As we discussed in previous blogs, the instructional design and related storyboarding effort is dependent on the raw content. And, the effort required is in turn dependent on the source of that content. Raw content can be provided in many ways and may or may not require the active participation of the selected vendor:

    1. Written: this may be in many forms, electronic files or hard copy only and from a variety of sources, such as:

    • Courseware from a classroom course
    • PPT presentations
    • Marketing materials
    • Technical product, system or application tutorials
    • Design document and outline

    2. Oral:

    • Interviews and collaboration with internal subject matter experts
    • Interviews with external subject matter experts

    3.Research

    4.Topic specific training or product use

    5. Combination of resources

       

       

       

      Whatever, the source for your raw content, it should be openly discussed at the scoping phase. This will enable your custom content development company to more effectively scope the project for time and cost as well as to identify the best internal resources for the project.  The more detailed and specific the raw content, the simpler the instructional design and storyboarding effort.

      For example, we created a highly successful course for an application training course. Since this content was for a new product for which no technical documentation had yet been written, the course raw content was provided as actual training of the instructional designer in the use of the application, an entirely hands -on process. Since no written content was provided, the instructional design and storyboarding effort required was a high level. 

      So, an experienced custom eLearning development company will work with you and the content you provide, no matter where that content may be found. But, it is critical that the client and the vendor understand what the source of that content is so that both can adequately assess the effort required to translate that into outstanding custom eLearning courseware.

      KMi has 10 years of custom content development experience. Let us put that experience in action for you. Contact Margie Herron at
      mherron@kmionline.com for more information.

       

       

       
      There are 0 comments

      After many years in custom content development for eLearning, I am convinced that there are as many successful ( and unsuccessful) approaches to instructional design as there are IDs! However, the one common thread between successful courseware is to consider the end user as a human being with many distractions, low motivation for training, a frenetic daily schedule, and the need to be engaged, all while juggling emails, meetings, reports, and other daily tasks. The objective of good ID is to connect with users to give them a short, concise, encompassing, and targeted learning experience that has clear learning points, outcomes, and professional impact.

      How this is accomplished depends on the ID and their understanding of the learner.  KMi believes in a multi-disciplinary approach to eLearning, combining three distinct backgrounds critical in a successful project team: business savvy to fully comprehend learning content and the need for the bottom-line impact of training, instructional expertise to understand the fundamentals and nuances of the learning process, and web design mastery to exploit the full advantages of the power of web-delivery. Accordingly, the backgrounds of an instructional design team can be varied: graduate degrees in education and instructional design, marketing, advertising, professional coaching, skills assessment, organizational psychology, and classroom training. This diverse perspective can lead to innovative and compelling custom content development.

      KMi has six questions that instructional designers ask themselves upon embarking on any given course.

      • What is the user’s motivation for taking this course?
      • Will the user see something within the first 30 seconds that will entice, excite, and draw in him or her?
      • Would I want to take this course amid a hectic daily business schedule? 
      • If a colleague asked the user about the course upon completion, what highlights would the user convey to the colleague?
      • Are the key learning points prominent and effectively presented to ensure that the learner identifies, comprehends, and retains them?
      • Will the course have an actual impact for the user at his or her job? (Is the connection between the training and the real-world job clear and compelling?)

      It is only after thoroughly understanding the answers to these questions that we decide the approach that is best for our custom eLearning solution. We employ a number of principles and methodologies as the basis for instructional design. While these theories are not exclusively used to define rigid parameters, they do provide a system of basic recommendation in the creation of any eLearning content development. We may employ one of or a combination of these (and other) ID approaches throughout the customized eLearning project.

      • ADDIE
      • Formative Summative Model
      • Cognitive Load Theory
      • Morrison, Ross and Kemp Model

      If you would like to learn more about the KMi instructional design approaches, our learning content development process, or our online learning platform, eLMS, please contact Margie Herron at mherron@kmionline.com. Be sure to check out our website at www.kmionline.com


       
      There are 0 comments

      Most people would agree that custom eLearning can provide a successful vehicle for training most of your supply chain. It is only recently, however, that many of our clients have embraced custom eLearning for their warehouse staff.  And, it has proved to be highly successful! Historically, online training for warehouse staff has been considered too intrusive to the daily routine of the staff members or computer access has been inconvenient. At KMi, we have seen a reversal on this perspective as companies realize making computers accessible and providing online training time for employees has resulted in better trained and better functioning staff.

      Developing customized eLearning content for your warehouse teams results in:

      • Just-in-time and on-demand training access. This allows your staff to participate in training exactly when it relates to their job need resulting in a higher level of learning as they apply the knowledge more immediately.
      • Custom eLearning can be developed and deployed quickly as learning gaps are identified or new skills are required. This means that your training program is dynamic and speaks to the real needs of a work environment. It eliminates the training delay common with most other learning programs.
      • Customized content speaks to their actual job function.  When you provide custom eLearning content curricula, you are presenting the content that relates to the staffs’ actual jobs, functions, and skills. There is no extraneous content to cloud and confuse the learning. It saves time and makes the learning more valuable to both the employee and the company.
      • Increases skill level of the warehouse staff and improves productivity of the warehouse. As your staff understands that the training is truly valuable to their job success, they embrace the opportunity to participate. And, because the training is available continuously, it can serve as a refresher and knowledge bank, adding ongoing value.

      In addition, the training can be tracked and reports generated through our SCORM conformant LMS, eLMS. This can assist you in understanding where your learning gaps are, how your learning programs effect your warehouse function and provide other metrics for evaluating your learning curriculum.

      If you would like to learn more about how KMI can help develop your warehouse staff, please contact Margie Herron  at mherron@kmionline.com .

       
      There are 0 comments
      Obviously, as an eLearning custom content  development provider, I am a strong advocate for the appropriate application of eLearning. Not only does its use benefit me as a provider, more importantly, it benefits me as a lifelong learner. I find I use some form of online learning nearly every day. And, you probably do as well. That said, because this use is often associated with just-in-time" how-to" applications, we forget how robust, exciting and innovative eLearning can be. I have been working with a financial services client for sometime.This client recognizes that  custom eLearning solutions can provide the foundation for onboarding or induction programs, customer service skills training,  communication skills training, financial services training, sales training, computer application training, legal and compliance training and so many other content areas.

      Not only has using customized eLearning benefited the client in the following ways:
      • reduced the cost of delivery
      • promoted training consistency across geographies and divisions
      • reduced time to market
      • delivered simultaneaously to all audience members, when they need it and on-demand

      it has also allowed the client to truly deliver content developed precisely for them. This means that their audience is learning about their specific culture, their specific use of software/hardware, including any customizations and the foundation for and application of any behaviors and concepts specific to their organization.

      The result: outstanding success in uptake, acceptance and desired behavior change.

      Let KMi assist you in achieving equally successful custom eLearning solutions. Please visit our website at www.kmionline.com or contact Margie Herron at mherron@kmionline.com.

       
      There are 0 comments
      There are loads of tools and techniques that our learning content development team use to make our customized eLearning courses as rich and engaging as possible. At KMi we have a wide repertoire of secrets that we use everyday that span all mediums, from photography techniques (one of which I'll describe today), to many software tools, to complex mixing of mediums such as 3D and 2D. I anticipate this new blog series to be a diverse, ongoing and unique window into the graphics for eLearning development world.
       
      Today, I'm going to describe a photographic technique we use to add richness to otherwise potentially ordinary elements. While some may get giddy at the sight of vast warehousing racks, many may have trouble seeing the excitement. In the example below we used HDR or High Dynamic Range, to generate the most eye catching and dramatic photo possible. Our goal in this example was to make the user look twice and not simply glance over the photo.

       
       
      Now for a little technical talk on how we produced this effect. HDR is a process where a single photo is developed by processing three or more separate photos of the same shot taken at different exposures. In our example here, I set our Nikon D90 to Autobracketing and quickly snapped off three photos at -2, 0, +2. This gave me one photo that was darker or underexposed (-2), one that was brighter or overexposed (+2) and one with a balanced, even exposure (0). With the aide of a special software (there are many which will do this including Photoshop CS5) and loads of tweaking, a single photo was produced that incorporated the best of all three exposures. 

       
      The benefit of HDR is that it allows the photographer to capture light and dark details which are impossible to capture with a single photograph. Some even claim it is more akin to how we see the world with our naked eye, an ability limited by camera technology. Imagine being in a darkish room and looking out a bright window. While the interior of the room is not as bright as the window you would still be able to see all the features of the room as well as the scene out the window. Now, if you took a photo of the same scene, most likely the window would be bright and clear but the room would be too dark to distinguish. HDR would allow both the room and the outdoors to be clear. Though the window example is very practical in practice, HDR is one of KMi's eLearning development tools that can also produce very dramatic results that are very pleasing to the eye.
       
      There are 0 comments
      So, the other day I was creating graphics for one of our customized eLearning courses using isometric projection and I ran into a problem. The graphic I was making had two complex pieces. I planned on drawing each individually and then I would marry the two to complete the final illustration. However, with the two pieces completed, I was unable to reconcile the two perspectives. My measurements were right, my angles perfectly drafted - so why were they not getting along? Even more confusing was the fact that I couldn't visually comprehend the problem.
       
      What I had stumbled on was what I call the isometric projection paradox. Isometric projection is the method of graphical representation where the three coordinate axes appear equally foreshortened. There is no distortion of perspective as we experience with our own eyes. Objects far away appear just as large as objects up close. 
       
      Let's look at a simple example of this. Below we have a graphic developed using isometric projection. The red ball appears to be higher than the blue ball.
       
      However, if we simply extend the platform we run into all kinds of problems. The larger steps to the right clearly show and increase in platform elevation but the perspective of the left side still indicates that they are in fact at the same level.

      Luckily this causes few problems for KMi's eLearning content developers and only produces the occasional and rather amusing brain tease. 
       
      There are 0 comments
      12
         

      ©2002-2012 KMi All Rights Reserved